AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 5.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 128 vs 80
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 179.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 250 vs 148
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 vs 2761
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 375 vs 337
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1282 vs 583
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1094
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 375 vs 337
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1282 vs 583
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1094
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 vs 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 vs 2761 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 vs 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 vs 1094 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 110 vs 67
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 vs 67 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 | 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 | 110 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | 2761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 1094 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Beema | Cedar |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1589 | 1592 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8.528 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz |