AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 179.2 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 93% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 29 Watt
- 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 vs 1361
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 93.854 vs 84.603
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.121 vs 10.608
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1282 vs 677
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1187
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1282 vs 677
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1187
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 vs 27 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops vs 167.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 29 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 vs 1361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 vs 84.603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 vs 10.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 vs 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 vs 1187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 vs 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 vs 1187 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 6.992 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 250
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 68
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.15 vs 2.751
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.294 vs 0.263
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 513 vs 375
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 513 vs 375
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 874 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.992 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 250 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 vs 68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 vs 2.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.294 vs 0.263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 513 vs 375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 513 vs 375 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 162 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | 1361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | 3.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | 84.603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | 0.294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | 10.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | 513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 1187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | 513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | 677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 1187 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Beema | GF119 |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 | 27 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1592 | 1581 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 874 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops | 167.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 6.992 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 29 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz |