AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 179.2 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 93% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 29 Watt
• 5.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 vs 1361
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 93.854 vs 84.603
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.121 vs 10.608
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1282 vs 677
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1187
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1282 vs 677
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1187

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM

• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 6.992 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 250
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 68
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.15 vs 2.751
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.294 vs 0.263
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 513 vs 375
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 513 vs 375

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	250 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 162
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7324 1361
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.751 3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	93.854 84.603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.263 0.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.121 10.608
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	375 513
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1282 677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1912 1187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	375 513
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1282 677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1912 1187

Compare specifications (specs)