AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 460 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 5.6 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 16
- 6.1x better floating-point performance: 179.2 gflops vs 29.44 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 38 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 248 vs 232
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 858
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 858
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 460 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s vs 3.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops vs 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 38 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 vs 232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 vs 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 vs 858 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 71 vs 68
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 71 vs 68 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 248 | 232 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | 71 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 858 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Beema | G84 |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 | 12 September 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1593 | 1592 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 460 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops | 29.44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 3.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 38 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz |