AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 7% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 5150
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1106
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1106
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 1841
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 1841
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3260
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 5150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 | 6869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3329 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Oland | GM107 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1281 | 953 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Price now | $189.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIRadeon 9250
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8510G
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820A
