AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 523 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 6x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 vs 320
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 164
- 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 968
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 vs 2.566
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 vs 53.127
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 4.47
- 14.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 5.049
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 764
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1677 vs 1131
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 764
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1677 vs 1131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 2 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 100.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1794 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 vs 320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 vs 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 vs 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 vs 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 vs 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 vs 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 vs 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 vs 1131 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 2.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 53.127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 4.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 5.049 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 1131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 1131 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GF119 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1578 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 523 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 100.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 4.184 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 14.35 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1794 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |