AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand vs AMD Radeon R7 M265
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand and AMD Radeon R7 M265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 850 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 528.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 528.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand | AMD Radeon R7 M265 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M230 Rebrand | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Sun | Topaz |
Launch date | 31 May 2014 | 20 May 2014 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1413 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 16.5 GTexel / s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 32 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |