AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs AMD Radeon HD 8510G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 and AMD Radeon HD 8510G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 450 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 450 vs 356
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 159 vs 102
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3721 vs 1406
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 3206
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 3206
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 vs 23 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 450 vs 356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 vs 102 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3721 vs 1406 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 vs 3206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 vs 3206 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8510G
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1766 vs 1444
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1766 vs 1444
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1766 vs 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1766 vs 1444 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8510G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | AMD Radeon HD 8510G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 450 | 356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 159 | 102 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3721 | 1406 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1444 | 1766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1444 | 1766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 | 3206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 | 3206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M240 | AMD Radeon HD 8510G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
Code name | Jet | Trinity |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1288 | 1291 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Boost clock speed | 554 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory type | Not Listed | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |