AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 and NVIDIA Quadro K610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon R5 M240

NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
Around 75% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3721 vs 1993
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 3195
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 3195

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 September 2014 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Texture fill rate	20.6 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	320 vs 192
Floating-point performance	659.2 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	3721 vs 1993
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3249 vs 3195
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3249 vs 3195

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 718 vs 450
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 159
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1444
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1444
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1123 vs 881
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1123 vs 881

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	718 vs 450
PassMark - G2D Mark	219 vs 159
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2253 vs 1444
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2253 vs 1444
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1123 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1123 vs 881

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K610M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

450

718

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

159

219

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3721

1993

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1444

2253

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1444

2253

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3249

3195

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3249

3195

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1123

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

881

1123

Name	AMD Radeon R5 M240	NVIDIA Quadro K610M
PassMark - G3D Mark	450	718
PassMark - G2D Mark	159	219
Geekbench - OpenCL	3721	1993
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1444	2253
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1444	2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3249	3195
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3249	3195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	881	1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	881	1123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		182.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		20.881

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 M240	NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Jet	GK208
Design	AMD Radeon R5 200 Series
Launch date	18 September 2014	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1297	1298
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$229.99
Price now		$75
Value for money (0-100)		11.43
Technical info
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	980 MHz
Floating-point performance	659.2 gflops	376.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	192
Texture fill rate	20.6 GTexel / s	15.68 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	1270 Million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		30 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	Not Listed
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	11	12
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	20.8 GB / s
Memory type	Not Listed	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		2600 MHz
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
HD3D
Powerplay
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus