AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 15.8x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 54.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 649 vs 12
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 138
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 6 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 vs 12 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 138 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | 12 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 138 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Exo | NV34 A2 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 6 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1186 | 1183 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 45 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Length | 171 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |