AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and ATI Radeon IGP 350M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 5.6x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 183 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 180 nm
- 108.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 649 vs 6
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 136
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 5 October 2002 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 183 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 180 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 vs 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 136 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 350M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | ATI Radeon IGP 350M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5010 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M430 | ATI Radeon IGP 350M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rage 6 |
Code name | Exo | RS200 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 5 October 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1181 | 1178 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 183 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 30 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |