AMD Radeon R5 M430 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M430 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 649 vs 442
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 118
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5010 vs 2413
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1087 vs 1019
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1087 vs 1019
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 9 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 vs 442 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5010 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 vs 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 vs 1019 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2843 vs 1157
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2212
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2843 vs 1157
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2212
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2843 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2843 vs 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 2212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | 442 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5010 | 2413 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 1019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | 2843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 | 3329 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Exo | GF117 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 9 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1182 | 1185 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 585 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |