AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 888 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3325
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3325
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 22 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 888 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 2097
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 2097
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 vs 3127
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 vs 3127
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5983 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5983 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3665 vs 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3665 vs 3127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2097 | 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2097 | 5983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 | 3665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 | 3665 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 | 3325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1021.371 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.143 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 56.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.697 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Oland | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 22 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 842 | 845 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 888 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 823 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |