AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 372 vs 226
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1093 vs 567
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 23 May 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 vs 226 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1093 vs 567 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 844 MHz vs 780 MHz
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 844 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | 226 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1093 | 567 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5928 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8550D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | Oland | Scrapper |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 694 | 706 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 844 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 760 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,303 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |