AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 370 vs 336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 3 December 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 vs 336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 1090
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8148 vs 5924
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3341
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 vs 1090 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 vs 5924 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 3446 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 | 8148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Oland | GM107 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 3 December 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 699 | 700 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1098 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
