AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
300x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3337
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3337

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 June 2016 vs 16 August 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Around 25% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 780 MHz
5.5x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 18.72 GTexel / s
3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
4.1x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 370
4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 1090
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 5924
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3341
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3341

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	915 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed	980 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate	102.5 billion / sec vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 384
Floating-point performance	2,459.5 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	468 vs 370
PassMark - G3D Mark	4413 vs 1090
Geekbench - OpenCL	15375 vs 5924
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684 vs 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684 vs 3341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

370

468

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1090

4413

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5924

15375

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3341

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3341

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3337

Name	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	370	468
PassMark - G3D Mark	1090	4413
Geekbench - OpenCL	5924	15375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3341	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3341	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		3285
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1615

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Oland	GK104
Launch date	30 June 2016	16 August 2012
Place in performance rating	699	701
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$299
Price now		$321.99
Value for money (0-100)		17.34
Technical info
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	980 MHz
Core clock speed	730 MHz	915 MHz
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops	2,459.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	1344
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s	102.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		1344
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	Two 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (24.1 cm)
SLI options		3-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA