AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A265 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 16.1x better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 994 vs 126
- 15.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 30
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6925 vs 2438
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 12 October 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 vs 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 vs 30 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6925 vs 2438 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 725 MHz
Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A265
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 A265 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 | 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 | 30 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6925 | 2438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 A265 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Opal | GT218 |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 12 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 484 | 1674 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | |
Price now | $32.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1402 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 260 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |