NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R7 A265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 994
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 468
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 6925
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 9 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 633.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 6925 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A265
- 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A265
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R7 A265 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 6925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R7 A265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Opal |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 9 January 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Place in performance rating | 487 | 484 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |