AMD Radeon R7 M270DX vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M270DX and NVIDIA Tesla K40m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 667 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 940 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 111
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 22 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 vs 111 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40m
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3281 vs 962
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3281 vs 962 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40m
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M270DX | NVIDIA Tesla K40m |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 | 111 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 962 | 3281 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18672 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1884.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.253 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 310.472 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M270DX | NVIDIA Tesla K40m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Topaz | GK110B |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 22 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 636 | 638 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | 745 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 667 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 7,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2880 | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |