AMD Radeon R7 M340 vs AMD Radeon R7 M265

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M340 and AMD Radeon R7 M265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M340

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 943 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 825 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 656 vs 546
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 138
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.48 vs 12.031
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 vs 68.392
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1732 vs 1264
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1732 vs 1264

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 5181
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 164.511
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 0.943
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 20.063
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2424 vs 1668
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2424 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M340
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M265

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	656 546
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	152 138
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5181 5587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.48 12.031
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	164.511 282.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.943 1.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.063 21.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.38 68.392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1550 1551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1732 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 2424
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1550 1551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1732 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 2424

Compare specifications (specs)