Intel HD Graphics 520 vs AMD Radeon R7 M340

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 520 and AMD Radeon R7 M340 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 520

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1021 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 867 vs 655
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 210 vs 152
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 vs 13.48
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.243 vs 0.943
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1668
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1668

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M340

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 943 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5182 vs 3993
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 164.511 vs 143.083
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.063 vs 12.958
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 vs 28.182
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1550 vs 951
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1732 vs 1462
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1550 vs 951
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1732 vs 1462

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M340

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	867 655
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	210 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3993 5182
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 13.48
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	143.083 164.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.243 0.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.958 20.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.182 74.38
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	951 1550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1462 1732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3337 1668

Compare specifications (specs)