AMD Radeon R7 M340 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M340 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M340
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 943 MHz vs 874 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 17.16 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 549.1 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 662 vs 353
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5203 vs 1345
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.48 vs 2.857
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1550 vs 629
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1732 vs 1102
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1550 vs 629
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1732 vs 1102
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 18 February 2013 |
Core clock speed | 943 MHz vs 874 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops vs 167.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 662 vs 353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5203 vs 1345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.48 vs 2.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1732 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1732 vs 1102 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
- Around 65% higher memory clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 153
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2918 vs 1668
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2918 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 vs 153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2918 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2918 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M340
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M340 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 662 | 353 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | 188 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5203 | 1345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.48 | 2.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 164.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.38 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1550 | 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1732 | 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1550 | 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1732 | 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 | 2918 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M340 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Meso | GF119 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 18 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1393 | 1396 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 943 MHz | 874 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 167.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 6.992 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 292 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 13.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |