AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs AMD Radeon R5 M335
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 906 vs 549
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 1080
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 1080
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1114
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1114
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2537 vs 1716
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2537 vs 1716
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5598 vs 4157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 21 October 2015 |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 906 vs 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 vs 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 vs 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 vs 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 vs 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 vs 1716 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 vs 4157 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M335
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1070 MHz vs 1021 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 21.4 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 684.8 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1070 MHz vs 1021 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 21.4 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 684.8 gflops vs 653.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 vs 174 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M335
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 906 | 549 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 | 1114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 | 1716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 | 1716 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 | 4157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Meso | Exo |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 21 October 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1114 | 1045 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz | 1070 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops | 684.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 20.42 GTexel / s | 21.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 1070 MHz | |
Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |