AMD Radeon R7 M465 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M465 and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M465
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3700 MHz
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3700 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 5841
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 864.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 vs 5841 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M465
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M465 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1135 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5841 | 13075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2535 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M465 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Litho | GF110 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1113 | 1116 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 960 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 1,331.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,000 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 177.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |