AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 44x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 258
- 89.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 34
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 17 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 258 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 vs 34 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 | 258 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 | 34 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1980 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Bonaire | NV35 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 17 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 659 | 661 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 1.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | 17.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | 550 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |