AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 971
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1980
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 971
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1980
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 21 December 2013 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 1980 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 3032
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 460
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 vs 3032 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 460 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 | 3048 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 508 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4468 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 1980 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Tobago | Bonaire |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 662 | 664 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | 183 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | 6500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |