AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M280X and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 971
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 971
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1980
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1980
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 February 2015 vs 21 December 2013 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1980 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,792 gflops
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 247
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 814
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,792 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 247 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 vs 814 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1980 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 508 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 814 | 3048 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M280X | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | Bonaire |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 5 February 2015 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 661 | 663 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |