AMD Radeon R9 270X vs ATI FireGL V3400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and ATI FireGL V3400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 42x more texture fill rate: 84 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 47.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4870 vs 103
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 612 vs 353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 1 October 2005 |
Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4870 vs 103 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 vs 353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V3400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 270X | ATI FireGL V3400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4870 | 103 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 | 353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 270X | ATI FireGL V3400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | R500 |
Code name | Curacao | RV530 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 1 October 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 453 | 455 |
Price now | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 157 million |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |