AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W7100 and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 103.0 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 3,297 gflops vs 2,688 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5251 vs 4870
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 612
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.781 vs 63.87
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.086 vs 85.21
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 361.58 vs 315.412
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops vs 2,688 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5251 vs 4870 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 vs 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 vs 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 vs 315.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 vs 1248.285
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.354 vs 5.854
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 vs 6362
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 vs 6362
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 vs 1248.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 vs 5.854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 vs 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 vs 6362 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W7100 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5251 | 4870 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | 612 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | 1314.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | 6.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 | 315.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6362 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6362 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W7100 | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Curacao |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 451 | 453 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $399 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,800 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |