Apple M2 Pro 16-core vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparative analysis of Apple M2 Pro 16-core and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 Pro 16-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 17 Jan 2023 vs 8 October 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- 80x more pipelines: 1280 vs 16
Pipelines | 1280 vs 16 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M2 Pro 16-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
Name | Apple M2 Pro 16-core | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47629 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4870 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M2 Pro 16-core | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 17 Jan 2023 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 450 | 453 |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
Code name | Curacao | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1398 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.726 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 16 | 1280 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |