AMD Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 280 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 8.8x more texture fill rate: 104.5 GTexel / s vs 11.89 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 1792 vs 320
- 7x better floating-point performance: 3,344 gflops vs 475.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 8.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5562 vs 660
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 665 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 March 2014 vs 14 May 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 104.5 GTexel / s vs 11.89 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 3,344 gflops vs 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5562 vs 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 vs 397 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 1656 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 280
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 280 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5562 | 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 | 397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.909 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 365.384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7957 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7957 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2009 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 280 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | R600 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 4 March 2014 | 14 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 423 | 376 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 933 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 3,344 gflops | 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 320 |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Texture fill rate | 104.5 GTexel / s | 11.89 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 720 million |
Core clock speed | 743 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 240 GB/s | 106.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |