AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 933 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 112.0 GTexel / s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 3,584 gflops vs 3,344 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 5.4x more memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6337 vs 5556
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 vs 665
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.958 vs 67.829
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.94 vs 6.495
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 vs 79.909
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 436.958 vs 365.384

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280

• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1266.685 vs 1070.209
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7957 vs 7664
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2340
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7957 vs 7664
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6337 5556
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	697 665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.958 67.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1070.209 1266.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.94 6.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.457 79.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	436.958 365.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7664 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3337

Compare specifications (specs)