AMD Radeon R9 370 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 17.7x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 1280 vs 80
- 28.4x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 88 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 25.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 188
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 382
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 188 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 382 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 110 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 188 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Trinidad | M92 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 414 | 415 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 |