AMD Radeon R9 370 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and ATI Radeon X1650 GTO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 587 MHz
- 33.2x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 7.1x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 784 MHz
- 63x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 75
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 384
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 2 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 587 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 784 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 75 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI Radeon X1650 GTO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 75 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 384 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI Radeon X1650 GTO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | R500 |
Code name | Trinidad | RV530 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 2 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 414 | 417 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 587 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 2.348 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 12.54 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 784 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |