AMD Radeon R9 370 vs ATI FireGL V8650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 688 MHz
- 7.1x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 1280 vs 320
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1736 MHz
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 550
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 637
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 688 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 440.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1736 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 550 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 637 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI FireGL V8650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 550 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 637 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370 | ATI FireGL V8650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Trinidad | R600 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 414 | 412 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,799 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 688 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 440.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 11.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 254 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 111.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 1736 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |