AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 23.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 202
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 413
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 5 June 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 202 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 413 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 12 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s
| Texture fill rate | 2x 12 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 202 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 413 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 370 | NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Curie |
| Code name | Trinidad | G71 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 June 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 412 | 409 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $54.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 2x 12 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 270 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 2x 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
