AMD Radeon R9 370 vs AMD FirePro S7000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and AMD FirePro S7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 4524
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 705
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.576 vs 52.282
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 271.967
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 August 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 2,432 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 4524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 vs 52.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 vs 271.967 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7000
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | AMD FirePro S7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 4524 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | 52.282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | 271.967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1275.287 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 66.159 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370 | AMD FirePro S7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 27 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 408 | 407 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,249 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 292 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |