AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

AMD Radeon R9 370

NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 31% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 706 MHz
2x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 4432
3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 210
5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 14510
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.576 vs 54.89
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 250.291

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 5 January 2013
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz vs 5200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4722 vs 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	781 vs 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	75346 vs 14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.576 vs 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	336.491 vs 250.291

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Around 88% higher texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
Around 95% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1280
Around 41% better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8319 vs 6096
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3718
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3357
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8319 vs 6096
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3718
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3357

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	146.8 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2496 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	3,524 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8319 vs 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7337 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	10873 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8319 vs 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7337 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	10873 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4722

4432

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

781

210

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

75346

14510

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

64.576

54.89

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

336.491

250.291

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6096

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

10873

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6096

8319

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

7337

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

10873

Name	AMD Radeon R9 370	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
PassMark - G3D Mark	4722	4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	781	210
Geekbench - OpenCL	75346	14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	64.576	54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	336.491	250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6096	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6096	8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	10873
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		83.807

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 370	NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Trinidad	GK110
Launch date	5 May 2015	5 January 2013
Place in performance rating	407	408
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,199
Technical info
Boost clock speed	975 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,496 gflops	3,524 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1280	2496
Texture fill rate	78 GTexel / s	146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	2,800 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	221 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB / s	208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5