AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 384
- 58.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 13.3x more pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 384
- 11.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,120 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Launch date | 3 September 2015 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 384 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 580 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Name | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2360 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Grenada | GF104 |
Launch date | 3 September 2015 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Place in performance rating | 266 | 263 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 580 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 4x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 345.6 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |