AMD Radeon R9 M270X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M270X and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 17.1x more texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 35.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 34
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 306 vs 276
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 9 August 2004 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 vs 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 vs 276 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M270X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 | 276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M270X | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
Code name | Venus | NV38 A1 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 9 August 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 610 | 607 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 135 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 9.0a |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 8.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 550 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |