AMD Radeon R9 M270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M270X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3571
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3571
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 23 October 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4142 vs 1204
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 589 vs 306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4142 vs 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 vs 306 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | 4142 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 | 589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3336 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Venus | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 23 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 610 | 613 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3540 Million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M270X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680MX
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
NVIDIAP104-100
