AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 14.5x more texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 223.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1565 vs 7
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 vs 170
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 6 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1565 vs 7 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 vs 170 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1565 | 7 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | 170 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kelvin |
Code name | Tropo | NV25 A2 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 6 February 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1018 | 1016 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 63 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 216 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 4.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 550 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | SDR |