AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- Around 92% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2771 vs 763
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 vs 403
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 7.457
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.907 vs 512.081
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 vs 1643
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 vs 1643
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 7 January 2010 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 vs 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 vs 403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 vs 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 vs 512.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 vs 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 vs 1643 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3314 vs 536
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2855
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3314 vs 536
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2855
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 768 |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3314 vs 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3314 vs 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2855 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2771 | 763 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 7.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 512.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 1643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M380 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Strato | Broadway |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 863 | 861 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,040 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore | ||
HDMI 1.3a |