AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 45.4 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
• Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2763 vs 2737
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 528 vs 427
• Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12839 vs 9013
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 25.814
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 vs 2.063
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 vs 30.402
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 62.233

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

• 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 vs 546.907
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 vs 3688
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 536
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2855
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 vs 3688
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 536
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2855

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2763 2737
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	528 427
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12839 9013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.701 25.814
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.907 623.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.618 2.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.878 30.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.051 62.233
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 3332

Compare specifications (specs)