AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 45.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 vs 2755
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 430
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12660 vs 9102
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 25.82
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 vs 2.201
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 vs 30.402
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 62.233
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 17 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 45.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 vs 2755 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12660 vs 9102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 vs 25.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 vs 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 vs 30.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 vs 62.233 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 vs 546.907
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 vs 3688
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2855
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 vs 3688
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 536
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2855
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 vs 546.907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 2855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 2855 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 | 2755 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12660 | 9102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 25.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 623.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 30.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 62.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Strato | GF114 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 17 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 875 | 877 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $353.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,950 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 99 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Eyefinity | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-Way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |