AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 33% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2771 vs 1947
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 vs 300
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12565 vs 5986
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 10.054
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 vs 1.46
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 vs 22.103
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 36.553

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
• Around 87% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3855 vs 3688
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 536
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 2855
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3855 vs 3688
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 536
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 2855

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2771 1947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	529 300
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12565 5986
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.701 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.907 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.618 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.878 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.051 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 4470

Compare specifications (specs)