AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385 and NVIDIA GeForce 7000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 900x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 1 MHz
- 3.1x more boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 239
- 158.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2061 vs 13
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 1 February 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 239 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 vs 13 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA GeForce 7000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 239 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 | 13 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA GeForce 7000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | |
| Code name | Strato | C67 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 1 February 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 731 | 728 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
| Pipelines | 2 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | shared Memory |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M385 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3450
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7000M
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
