AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3002 vs 1032
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3002 vs 1032
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 198
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 732 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 vs 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 vs 1032 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 1,792 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3322
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3322
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4403 vs 2061
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 56 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 1,792 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3322 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 vs 2061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 7038 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 198 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 | 4403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M385 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Strato | GK110 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 714 | 716 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 7,080 million |
Pipelines | 2688 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
TrueAudio | ||
ZeroCore |