AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs ATI Radeon X600 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385 and ATI Radeon X600 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 35x more texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 30.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2061 vs 67
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 1 September 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 vs 67 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X600 PRO
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 252 vs 244
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 252 vs 244 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600 PRO
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385 | ATI Radeon X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3002 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 252 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2061 | 67 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M385 | ATI Radeon X600 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Rage 9 |
| Code name | Strato | RV370 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 1 September 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | 714 | 712 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 107 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 36 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 9.0 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M385 with others
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
ATIRadeon X600 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
ATIRadeon X1550
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
AMDRadeon R9 M385 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 XT
