AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, API support, Memory, Technologies, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 vs 4950
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 16.41
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 857.798
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 1.344
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 45.514
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 184.41
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 4238
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 4238
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 vs 21 October 2010 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 vs 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 1.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 1232
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 1232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 1.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3349 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Barts |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
Launch date | 09 June 2015 | 21 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 831 | 824 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.38 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
CrossFire | ||
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
Pipelines | 1120 | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 220 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin |