AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M390 und AMD Radeon HD 6870 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20250 vs 4950
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 16.41
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 857.798
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 1.344
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 45.514
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 184.41
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 4238
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 4238
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 vs 21 October 2010 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 vs 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 1.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3349 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 6870
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 1232
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 1232
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 1232 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20250 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 1.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3349 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
Codename | Pitcairn | Barts |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 | 21 October 2010 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 831 | 824 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $239 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $89.99 | |
Typ | Desktop | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 38.38 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speicherbandbreite | 134.4 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1050 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore | ||
CrossFire | ||
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 900 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,016.0 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 1120 | |
Texturfüllrate | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 151 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,700 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Länge | 220 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 2x 6-pin |