AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs AMD Radeon HD 7790
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M390 and AMD Radeon HD 7790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, API support, Memory, Technologies, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20526 vs 14832
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 40.763
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 828.247
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 3.646
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 63.284
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 217.744
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 5087
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1232 vs 988
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2061
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 5087
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1232 vs 988
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2061
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 09 June 2015 vs 22 March 2013 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 vs 14832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 40.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 828.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 3.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 63.284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 217.744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 vs 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 7790 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 | 14832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 40.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 828.247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 63.284 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 217.744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2061 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 5087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2061 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M390 | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Bonaire |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Launch date | 09 June 2015 | 22 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 803 | 820 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $134.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 29.57 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 183 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |

